http://users.livejournal.com/_nextboldmove_/ ([identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nextboldmove_/) wrote in [community profile] criminalxminds2009-10-28 09:17 am

(no subject)


SPOILER? about Hotch and how Ed Bernero really feels about Mandy...

Type your cut contents here
  

When will the Criminal Minds producers loosen up Hotch? — Roly
ADAM: To hear executive producer Ed Bernero tell it, they don't need to loosen him up at all. "We all believe that Hotch's stoic nature, his strength, his resolve, is one of the glues that holds the show together," Bernero says. "His unflinching portrayal of a true-believer G-man allows all the other characters to be a bit eccentric...  because there is a representation of the real FBI in Hotch." That said, Bernero promises the show's 100th episode will give fans a completely different view of Hotch.

  I can't find the exact article, but I read the other day in TV GUIDE that Ed Bernero will never work with Mandy again after he failed to show for the season 3 table read.  He also said that nobody on the cast misses Mandy and that Mandy really hurt the whole team at CM.  Basically, he had nothing nice to say.  When I find the article or link, I'll post it. 

[identity profile] southrnbygrace.livejournal.com 2009-10-28 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
While I agree about Ed's description of Hotch, even the most hardcore G-men have lives outside of their job. I wouldn't want Hotch to change at work, but it would be nice to see him relax once in a while and not constantly be 'on duty'. :)
Edited 2009-10-28 16:47 (UTC)

[identity profile] southrnbygrace.livejournal.com 2009-10-29 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL...thanks. It's a good thing there are so many great icon makers cause I wouldn't have a clue where to begin. That one is compliments of audiopineapple. The one in this post is by sodoesrachel.
Edited 2009-10-29 22:09 (UTC)

[identity profile] annievh.livejournal.com 2009-10-29 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
the one on this post is also lovely, btw
:-*

[identity profile] sodoesrachael.livejournal.com 2009-10-30 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Aw, thank you muchly! :P (I had to use this one in response to the other you used... lol.)