who rape and torture are just plain EVIL-BORN!unsubs
We haven't actually had an evil-born!unsub on Criminal Minds that wasn't a child or in the grip of a mental illness (though sometimes the triggering horror-story is only mentioned on the side instead of a narrative focus). The writers been very, very good about not going the Bad Seed route, which I appreciate, because psychologists have pretty much proven that doesn't exist. Children can have brain damage or misfirings in brain development that can make them capable of sociopathic, murderous actions if left undiagnosed and/or untreated, true, but the key phrase there is "undiagnosed and untreated." There are far more people with frontal-lobe development problems/endocrine imbalance than there are serial killers, precisely because proper parenting can overcome those biological tendencies. I LOVE that this show keeps ramming that point home because there are too many people in lobbyist/educational/parenting circles who literally give up on kids because of the Bad Seed belief. KEEP SUBVERTING THAT SUCKER, SHOW, SUBVERT IT!
The other four times they've seriously pushed Willful Suspension of Disbelief too far from a forensic psychology standpoint were: the unsub in The Fisher King (yeah, right, as if); Adam/Amanda and Tobias Henkel (there's never been a single clinically proven case of multiple personality disorder, and to run into two who both focus the same profiler? Uh, no); and George Foyet (who was a Perfect Storm). I do give them a pass on Foyet, though, because in order to get the endgame of a Professor Moriarty to Hotch's Sherlock, they really couldn't have written him any other way.
Personaly, I'd like a little more variety in crime type: more arson, more bombers or snipers, more "Won't Get Fooled Again"/"Derailed"-style plot twists, and some unsubs that are just in it for the money. There is a whole host of "serial"-type crimes career criminals perpetrate for no other reason than the money, and the FBI does deal with them.
...but the Suits probably think those'd be boring. :/
I can just see it now: Exec: "So it's not a serial killer?" Writer: "Exactly! It just looks like one at the beginning." Exec: "But this is a show about serial killers. It has to be a serial killer at the end." Writer: "But the BAU in real life handles all sorts of cases, not just serial killers, and this would be different from what we normally do." Exec: "Viewers don't want different. They tune in to see serial killers because this show is marketed as being about serial killers, so give them serial killers."
Probably true about the Exec, which is a shame because one of the things they were careful to exposit in the very first episode was that the BAU *doesn't* just do serial killers.
But, dammit, if we're talking about the Messer level exec, she should know better. I don't think story ideas get pitched higher than that, judging from some of the FUs to TPTB we saw in Season 6. Which just makes it more irritating, I guess.
TL;DR -- my own nitpicks about the show
Date: Nov. 4th, 2011 01:26 am (UTC)Thank you. ^^
that parental abuse is the most common one.
It is, by a landslide.
who rape and torture are just plain EVIL-BORN!unsubs
We haven't actually had an evil-born!unsub on Criminal Minds that wasn't a child or in the grip of a mental illness (though sometimes the triggering horror-story is only mentioned on the side instead of a narrative focus). The writers been very, very good about not going the Bad Seed route, which I appreciate, because psychologists have pretty much proven that doesn't exist. Children can have brain damage or misfirings in brain development that can make them capable of sociopathic, murderous actions if left undiagnosed and/or untreated, true, but the key phrase there is "undiagnosed and untreated." There are far more people with frontal-lobe development problems/endocrine imbalance than there are serial killers, precisely because proper parenting can overcome those biological tendencies. I LOVE that this show keeps ramming that point home because there are too many people in lobbyist/educational/parenting circles who literally give up on kids because of the Bad Seed belief. KEEP SUBVERTING THAT SUCKER, SHOW, SUBVERT IT!
The other four times they've seriously pushed Willful Suspension of Disbelief too far from a forensic psychology standpoint were: the unsub in The Fisher King (yeah, right, as if); Adam/Amanda and Tobias Henkel (there's never been a single clinically proven case of multiple personality disorder, and to run into two who both focus the same profiler? Uh, no); and George Foyet (who was a Perfect Storm). I do give them a pass on Foyet, though, because in order to get the endgame of a Professor Moriarty to Hotch's Sherlock, they really couldn't have written him any other way.
Personaly, I'd like a little more variety in crime type: more arson, more bombers or snipers, more "Won't Get Fooled Again"/"Derailed"-style plot twists, and some unsubs that are just in it for the money. There is a whole host of "serial"-type crimes career criminals perpetrate for no other reason than the money, and the FBI does deal with them.
...but the Suits probably think those'd be boring. :/
I can just see it now:
Exec: "So it's not a serial killer?"
Writer: "Exactly! It just looks like one at the beginning."
Exec: "But this is a show about serial killers. It has to be a serial killer at the end."
Writer: "But the BAU in real life handles all sorts of cases, not just serial killers, and this would be different from what we normally do."
Exec: "Viewers don't want different. They tune in to see serial killers because this show is marketed as being about serial killers, so give them serial killers."
DragonLady
Re: It's about serial killers.
Date: Nov. 4th, 2011 03:29 pm (UTC)But, dammit, if we're talking about the Messer level exec, she should know better. I don't think story ideas get pitched higher than that, judging from some of the FUs to TPTB we saw in Season 6. Which just makes it more irritating, I guess.