Round Table Mondays: Bit Parts
Feb. 5th, 2012 10:09 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
"There are no small roles, only small actors." -Constantin Stanislavski
I think most of us are in agreement that what makes Criminal Minds memorable is the characters. We tune in each week to watch our Band of Seven battle the monsters.
And of course, the guest stars are an essential ingredient. Whether it's the Cop Of The Week or the Latest Monster, characters like Cal McGee the OCD cop and Floyd Feylinn Farrel the Lucky Cannibal stick in our minds.
But there's a third group I'd like to discuss.
This group is the "bit players". Actors whose names are usually listed in the end credits, who may only have a few lines but who frequently bring to the episode a bit of depth and texture. They are not usually well known (although there are exceptions) and their names are not the ones drawing the viewer but they bring flavor to the story in the same way a dash of salt enhances all the other ingredients to a dish.
Frequently these characters are witnesses who provide information that could have as easily been one of the team, or one of the local cops saying "We talked to a witness who said....". Sometimes they're the friends or family of victims. Sometimes they're just part of the "living scenery".
To illustrate who I'm talking about, some examples would be:
In "What Fresh Hell" Mr. Lomax, the unsub's envious neighbor. "His yard never has any crabgrass".
In "Identity" the store clerk - most awesome bystander ever! - who sees the abduction and runs back into the store. You think she's running to call 911 until she comes back out with a shotgun as big as she is.
In "Zoe's Reprise", the cynical-eyed, cigarette smoking crime reporter. I think I might have a teensy crush on her.
It seems to me that CM has always had good bit parts that added to the overall quality of the show. It also seems to me that there has been a lack of them in the current season, which may be why some of the episodes seem (IMO) curiously flat. It's as if something is missing, but you can't put your finger on it - and I think maybe one factor is a lack of good bit parts.
So, what do you think?
Who were some of your favorite "bit players" on CM?
Do you think they actually contributed to the storyline, or was their purpose to add depth, interest, or even a touch of comic relief to the episode?
Did their part add to the characterization of any of the main characters?
Do you think that there has been a shortage of these characters in Season 7? And if so, do you think this has taken something away from the depth or texture of the show?
I think most of us are in agreement that what makes Criminal Minds memorable is the characters. We tune in each week to watch our Band of Seven battle the monsters.
And of course, the guest stars are an essential ingredient. Whether it's the Cop Of The Week or the Latest Monster, characters like Cal McGee the OCD cop and Floyd Feylinn Farrel the Lucky Cannibal stick in our minds.
But there's a third group I'd like to discuss.
This group is the "bit players". Actors whose names are usually listed in the end credits, who may only have a few lines but who frequently bring to the episode a bit of depth and texture. They are not usually well known (although there are exceptions) and their names are not the ones drawing the viewer but they bring flavor to the story in the same way a dash of salt enhances all the other ingredients to a dish.
Frequently these characters are witnesses who provide information that could have as easily been one of the team, or one of the local cops saying "We talked to a witness who said....". Sometimes they're the friends or family of victims. Sometimes they're just part of the "living scenery".
To illustrate who I'm talking about, some examples would be:
In "What Fresh Hell" Mr. Lomax, the unsub's envious neighbor. "His yard never has any crabgrass".
In "Identity" the store clerk - most awesome bystander ever! - who sees the abduction and runs back into the store. You think she's running to call 911 until she comes back out with a shotgun as big as she is.
In "Zoe's Reprise", the cynical-eyed, cigarette smoking crime reporter. I think I might have a teensy crush on her.
It seems to me that CM has always had good bit parts that added to the overall quality of the show. It also seems to me that there has been a lack of them in the current season, which may be why some of the episodes seem (IMO) curiously flat. It's as if something is missing, but you can't put your finger on it - and I think maybe one factor is a lack of good bit parts.
So, what do you think?
Who were some of your favorite "bit players" on CM?
Do you think they actually contributed to the storyline, or was their purpose to add depth, interest, or even a touch of comic relief to the episode?
Did their part add to the characterization of any of the main characters?
Do you think that there has been a shortage of these characters in Season 7? And if so, do you think this has taken something away from the depth or texture of the show?
no subject
Date: Feb. 6th, 2012 08:26 pm (UTC)I think one wonderful bit player was the Secretary in P911, when they question her about which children have left school at the end of last year and she couldn't remember. She finally does give them helpful info, but before she knows it, the team is gone...
I really liked the hooker in "Memoriam", too - she went from "hitting" on him to having her curiosity piqued by his comment. Though I'm not sure if Reid being so oblivious is also because he is preoccupied with the case. He's not even really into the game he's playing (I think it's Black Jack?) Another character from "The Instincs/Memoriam" would be Diane's doctor. He seemed like the grandfather type you'd trust with your secrets.
I also really liked the tech girl from "Lo-Fi/Mayhem". Her part was a bit more than a "bit", but I like how she worked so well with Garcia and how Garcia seemed to mother her and try to help her deal with all the awful things she sees - and all of it wasn't some huge drama, just acknowledgement that this is part of the job, too. Also in this category of a bit more than a bit would probably be Steven Culp's Lawyer from Tabula Rasa - he was amazing the charocal-grey scene is one of my favorites, ever.
One actress who really worked the one scene (actually, it was two, but one important one) she had was the girl in "The Popular Kids" who confided in Gideon that the kids had seen the tourist decompose for months.
The Landlady from "Scared to Death" who calls in about her missing tenant was fantastic, too. Just the kind of lady you'd think would REALLY keep track of her tenants.
I'll have to do some thinking about this, maybe I can come up with a few more :)
no subject
Date: Feb. 6th, 2012 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 6th, 2012 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 7th, 2012 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 7th, 2012 03:26 pm (UTC)Yeah... I'm not impressed by those storytelling elements. They seem lazy, compared to CM's usual standards. But, like I said, I was cringing the moment Beth appeared, so... I'm difficult. :-D
no subject
Date: Feb. 8th, 2012 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 8th, 2012 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 6th, 2012 10:54 pm (UTC)> Though I'm not sure if Reid being so oblivious is also because he is preoccupied with the case.
That should've read:
Though I'm SURE Reid being so oblivious is also because he is preoccupied with the case.
no subject
Date: Feb. 6th, 2012 11:05 pm (UTC)And I think it's a mistake. As I said in the intro, I think the bit players are an important factor in making the team and the case interesting. I really think the show has always been about the team, but in the past the "glimpses" we got of the team's character were done more indirectly, and it was often their reaction to one of the bit players that gave us that glimpse.
no subject
Date: Feb. 6th, 2012 11:25 pm (UTC)Other than that, we concur more or less.
no subject
Date: Feb. 7th, 2012 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 7th, 2012 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 8th, 2012 11:46 am (UTC)