[identity profile] x-forgetromeo.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] criminalxminds
 


I'd like to take this opportunity to say that whether or not you loved/hated Ashley Seaver, Rachel Nichols as an actress is a human being who did not deserve to be sidelined liked this. She obviously loved her job and her co-workers, and is justifiably upset about this. 

CBS pulled the same stunt with Rachel that they did with AJ and Paget last year. Please keep that in mind. CBS might have fixed one of the symptoms by bringing AJ and Paget back, but they have in no way solved the problem of treating their actresses as disposable.

If you can, please send Rachel some love on twitter. 

Date: May. 29th, 2011 05:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philstar22.livejournal.com
I didn't screen it, so I can't unscreen it. All I'm getting is notification that you keep deleting your comments.

Also, most so called chick flicks are badly made movies that aren't necessarily what women actually want to see in a film. The amount of money they make has less to do with being female-centric and more to do with being really bad movies. The same goes with tv shows. The problem is, Hollywood gives us female-centric media that is of lower quality than the male equivalents, gives us female characters who are not as well written as the male. And then they claim it is the audience's fault when they don't love this stuff and say it is because females are in the lead. They excuse themselves so they don't have to change anything.

Date: May. 29th, 2011 05:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-sunflowers.livejournal.com
Also, most so called chick flicks are badly made movies that aren't necessarily what women actually want to see in a film. The amount of money they make has less to do with being female-centric and more to do with being really bad movies. The same goes with tv shows. The problem is, Hollywood gives us female-centric media that is of lower quality than the male equivalents, gives us female characters who are not as well written as the male.

LOL. Okay whatever. The mere thought that "chick flicks" are somehow worse written than GI Joe just makes me laugh too hard. As to the rest of your statements? Yeah...still laughing too hard.

No one excuses themselves so that they don't have to change anything. They don't have to change anything because when they do, it doesn't work - or more accurately, doesn't make them as much money. You want a system that allows more creativity? Then start campaigning for one that's not based on revenue. Good luck with changing it from a capitalist industry though. The Almighty Dollar is what wins all the time.

If you want more female-driven characters and actors, then go watch more of them. More importantly, get MORE people to watch them. That's the only way the industry is going to change.

Date: May. 29th, 2011 09:14 am (UTC)
a_blackpanther: (wliz)
From: [personal profile] a_blackpanther
Well written "chick flicks" do get as much money as male lead comedies - look at Bridesmaids (the recent film). As for TV shows with female leads that I can think of the top of my head: Grey's Anatomy, Covert Affairs, Fringe. Also: Medium, Ghost Whisperer.

People will watch well written shows, even if the lead is a female.

Profile

criminalxminds: (Default)
CriminalxMinds @ DW

August 2023

M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
141516171819 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 11:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios