That thing we are discussing about 5x01
Sep. 25th, 2009 08:23 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The dialog from the scene:
F: Do you want to see my scars? What do you think? Do you like them? Yours are gonna look just the same
H: My team
F: Your team, your team didn't catch me untill I wanted them to. You're not in charge so don't be foolish. Now try to relax. Your body will go numb (knife goes in) and it goes in so much easier if you relax. The hard part is not passing out from the pain. (Foyet pulls the knife our slowly) Now I understand that profilers think that stabbing is a substitution for the act of sex, that if somebody is impotent, they'll use a knife instead. Is that what you think agent Hotchner? Maybe this will change the way you profile. (knife goes in)
So what do you think did the scene mean?
[Poll #1462291]
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 01:45 pm (UTC)Or maybe I just can't bare the though of that happening to Hotch.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 04:09 pm (UTC)Also someone posted a picture of the blood pool in the other post and mentioned that it wasn't smudged at all so that would probably mean no physical rape either.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 04:49 pm (UTC)So, not saying none of that wasn't possible, but I am saying that set-dressers left a crime scene bloodstain that in to way resembled what would have occurred had it happened the way it had in Hotch's flashback.
The show doesn't have many boo-boos, but that blood stain was wrong, even from what we know of what happened. A set-dresser poured a can of red Caro on the carpet, that's all.
Like you said, the show isn't overly-concerned with realism -- which also means the claim of 'no smudging of the blood stain' is also moot.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 26th, 2009 04:43 am (UTC)