That thing we are discussing about 5x01
Sep. 25th, 2009 08:23 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The dialog from the scene:
F: Do you want to see my scars? What do you think? Do you like them? Yours are gonna look just the same
H: My team
F: Your team, your team didn't catch me untill I wanted them to. You're not in charge so don't be foolish. Now try to relax. Your body will go numb (knife goes in) and it goes in so much easier if you relax. The hard part is not passing out from the pain. (Foyet pulls the knife our slowly) Now I understand that profilers think that stabbing is a substitution for the act of sex, that if somebody is impotent, they'll use a knife instead. Is that what you think agent Hotchner? Maybe this will change the way you profile. (knife goes in)
So what do you think did the scene mean?
[Poll #1462291]
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 02:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 06:50 am (UTC)DragonLady
no subject
Date: Sep. 28th, 2009 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 01:45 pm (UTC)Or maybe I just can't bare the though of that happening to Hotch.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 01:41 pm (UTC)I'm of the opinion that what happened was a rape whether it involved penetration or not. I think it's equally possible that Foyet was pressing himself against Hotch and achieved his climax that way--which is still degrading and objectifying for the victim and is in no way less serious then penetrative rape, especially when the stabbing is added into the equation--or quite literally raped him, in the legal sense. After all, we don't see all nine stabs or what happens after. His flashback cuts out before Foyet is finished, which leaves a huge blank spot. There's also the added trauma of Foyet bundling him up and taking him off to the hospital, conflating caregiving with sexual and physical assault.
This is network television. Showing a male rape is more or less impossible. I also think that the writers might be trying to get us to think about the implications of rape and the fact that it can be more than a penetrative act.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:57 pm (UTC)This is probably the closest full scene with strong male rape implications that I've seen on any TV show. Taking it strictly out of context, this scene was well filmed and deftly handled -- it's chilling in its buildup (Foyet stripping his shirt) and portrays a non-consensual situation without even using the actual words or even much movement (no struggling from Hotch).
I also think that the writers might be trying to get us to think about the implications of rape and the fact that it can be more than a penetrative act.
The scene works well as meta exploration of psychological domination and even implied rape -- if actual sexual penetration is indeed what they are going for, I hope the writers give this proper mileage with the aftermath/PTSD, not drop it like a hot potato as if nothing happened.
Male rape involves complex psychological issues, especially when the victim is someone like Hotch, whose ability to control and lead is so integral to his character. It would certainly be brave for them to "go there" -- not just referring to the open interpretation of this Foyet/Hotch scene but an affirmative confirmation in a future ep -- but they will NEED to be brave enough to follow it up in a believable way. Saying Hotch was raped without any form of fallout would seriously trivialize rape and its severity/consequences.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 02:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 02:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 02:43 pm (UTC)Also he put emphasis on the word "impotent", as if that was the particular part of the profile he wanted to prove erroneous; and there really is only one way to prove you're not impotent.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 02:44 pm (UTC)Now Hotch is going to second guess profiles of knife-killers.
Or so I believe.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 04:36 pm (UTC)I think that's what they intended at least. But they probably left it ambiguous to really mess with us.
no subject
Date: Sep. 28th, 2009 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:19 pm (UTC)But idk, this is really interesting.
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:24 pm (UTC)I admit that the idea of rape occurred to me (rather sharply and unpleasantly, considering my threshold for fictional non-con) because of the Foyet stripping his shirt/lying on top of Hotch sequence. The conversation definitely alluded to rape.
But I ultimately think that it was more a mindfuck than anything else, because Foyet is the kind of guy that loves psychological domination/humiliation/control far more than any physical release -- he could stop killing for ten years just to savor the sense of control he had over Shaugnessy. It's all about the mindgames and less about physical aggression alone (although he clearly enjoyed kicking the crap out of Hotch).
I think that if he did nick Hotch's "equipment" in any way there would be a far more violent reflex action of pain from Hotch than the passive "umph" we saw. And although Hotch did not tell Emily the truth, his behavior throughout the scenes did not have the raw/bruised/edgy feel of someone who had been raped.
So in the end I think it was just very uncomfortable innuendo that, unless everyone involved in writing and producing the script has NO sense of subtext, was entirely intentional for the squirm/squick effect.
I do hope that they don't run with the rape plot thread, because it really is too much to throw at Hotch on top of everything he's already been through, from being blown up in S4 to getting baited and stabbed by a psycho with a very unhealthy obsession with him. And judging from the patchy, poorly developed plot arc with Reid's drug addiction, if they DID go with Hotch being raped they're probably going to sprinkle a few half-assed attempts at PTSD and Hotch is "back to normal" again. Continuity is not CM's strong suit!
no subject
Date: Sep. 26th, 2009 05:06 am (UTC)*points to SGA and CSI* In the absolute sense, not as much so as a single-author novel. But comparitively? They're pretty damn on-target. The thing with writing for TV is that you do have to exercise care not to drive away huge chunks of your viewership, which means going easy on plotlines that fall outside the general premise of your show.
And I was so happy to see that drug-addiction plotline go away that I cannot possibly tell you. ^^
DragonLady
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 05:47 pm (UTC)i am absolutely sure that the rape happened but i think it happened WITH the knife. (sick, i know, but it wouldn't surprise me if it got to that extend)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 06:39 pm (UTC)WHEN WILL WE SEE FICS BASED ON THIS EPISODE?!?!
lol
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 07:49 pm (UTC)*waits (im)patiently*
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 08:31 pm (UTC)and fan fiction.. link us up people.. ill read it! :-)
no subject
Date: Sep. 25th, 2009 08:51 pm (UTC)That, to me, says a lot. I don't think it had anything to do with rape or emasculation. For the longest time, Foyet kept the BAU baffled because they couldn't properly analyze the victimology pertaining to his crimes. I think Foyet simply wanted to show Hotch that he cannot be put in a box and be assigned a specific profile just like the other killers.
no subject
Date: Sep. 26th, 2009 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 27th, 2009 05:16 pm (UTC)- The writers wanted to suggest emasculation but have no intention of actually following through (aka they want to create an allusion but it's not what happened)
and :
- Foyet meant that he can have sex, but he actually likes stabbing more and Hotch also understood it that way via implication/conversation alone that stabbing has it's own appeal, on its own merits and Hotch will consider that during his next profiles
I voted first one...
But all the suggestions about the networks restrains are also very tempting...
no subject
Date: Sep. 28th, 2009 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 28th, 2009 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Sep. 29th, 2009 03:27 pm (UTC)i was going to back out, because there's no multiple choice, and then hit submit instead of read comments. :\ dur.
all i know is: it was disturbingly hot. and I may have watched those scenes a few times over, biting my knuckles and making happy sounds.